But many inside and outside the banking business say the programs, while
extremely profitable for the banks, are a bad deal for consumers. The
new "overdraft protection" programs are more expensive and restrictive
than the overdraft lines of credit that banks have offered for decades
to favored clients who have big balances or other accounts. Unlike those
lines of credit, which typically charge annual interest of up to 20 percent,
the new programs charge flat fees for each overdraft that translate into
an annual rate of 1,000 percent or more.
Unlike
traditional lines of credit, which allow repayment whenever the customer
chooses, these programs require customers to bring their accounts back
into balance in only a few days.
While
traditional lines of credit have limits of several thousand dollars, the
new programs have limits of $100 to $300. After that, banks again start
bouncing checks. The programs are used disproportionately by low-income
and moderate-income people, according to industry consultants who help
banks create the programs in return for a share of the fees they generate.
The rapid spread of the programs has turned overdrafts, and the fees that
come with them, into one of the largest sources of profit for banks, according
to consultants and statistics compiled by government bank regulators.
Washington Mutual, the nation's seventh-largest financial institution
and the largest to promote overdraft protection, charged customers more
than an estimated $1 billion in overdraft fees last year.
But
regulators, consumer groups and some bankers and industry analysts say
the overdraft programs, which come with fees of up to $35 per overdraft,
are essentially high-interest loans aimed at working-class customers.
And because the programs work automatically with debit cards, customers
often do not realize they have overdrawn their accounts until they receive
a letter from the bank.
"Some banks are looking at the fact that some consumers barely make it
from payday to payday and have a very low balance, and instead of offering
them a beneficial service, they are charging their customers bounced-check
fees to take advantage of the situation," said Jean Ann Fox, director
of consumer protection for the Consumer Federation of America.
Overdraft
charges are the largest part of a long-term move by banks to depend more
on fees and less on interest from loans, regulators and consultants say.
A study by the Federal Reserve last year found that banks raised their
overdraft fees 24 percent from 1997 to 2001, to an average of $20.42.
Overall, banks will charge $30 billion in ATM, bounced-check and overdraft
fees this year, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., up 14
percent from 2001.
BY
ALEX BERENSON THE NEW YORK TIMES